UFO Hearing in Congress
Posted: 17 May 2022, 07:25
--Asked what information they will declassify for public: Answer: when it does not involve sources and methods and doesn't pose a security threat, they will release the information.
A forum for Wosbald to spam Crux articles
https://www.christianpipesmokers.org/
Hmmmm, I'm not watching the hearing, but I wonder if LaHood - an R - is fishing for an answer such as "Inasmuch as we wish to gather a large amount of data, any information citizens provide, in any form, in any place, will be considered and evaluated based on the expertise of said citizen and evidence they provide and will never be dismissed or classified as disinformation out of hand. Our desire is that no penalties of any sort be applied to any person for submitting information in good faith."tuttle wrote: 17 May 2022, 07:16 . . .The congressman keeps asking what legal ramifications should be placed on citizens for UFO disinformation (the rep is LaHood).
I don't know if it was that specifically, but I think it was more of a national security angle. Like, if someone makes some sort of claim that wastes the time and money of the US government with a fabricated claim, what legal action will the Task Force take. And the Task Force dude more or less said that holding people legally accountable for false information isn't his job.FredS wrote: 17 May 2022, 08:39Hmmmm, I'm not watching the hearing, but I wonder if LaHood - an R - is fishing for an answer such as "Inasmuch as we wish to gather a large amount of data, any information citizens provide, in any form, in any place, will be considered and evaluated based on the expertise of said citizen and evidence they provide and will never be dismissed or classified as disinformation out of hand. Our desire is that no penalties of any sort be applied to any person for submitting information in good faith."tuttle wrote: 17 May 2022, 07:16 . . .The congressman keeps asking what legal ramifications should be placed on citizens for UFO disinformation (the rep is LaHood).
You know something like that rather than labeling folks as crackpot conspiracy theorists spreading misinformation.
DHS already has a See Something Say Something program. I'm willing to bet 95% of the calls to their hotline turn out to be false alarms, but if they want folks ratting on bad guys or just their crazy vacine-mandate-rejecting neighbor, they can't come down on them if their reports turn out to be of no consequence. It'll be the same way with the aim-sog. Once they run down a few red herrings from that whack-job wosbald they'll just start to ignore him, not snuff him. I hope.tuttle wrote: 17 May 2022, 09:30I don't know if it was that specifically, but I think it was more of a national security angle. Like, if someone makes some sort of claim that wastes the time and money of the US government with a fabricated claim, what legal action will the Task Force take. And the Task Force dude more or less said that holding people legally accountable for false information isn't his job.FredS wrote: 17 May 2022, 08:39Hmmmm, I'm not watching the hearing, but I wonder if LaHood - an R - is fishing for an answer such as "Inasmuch as we wish to gather a large amount of data, any information citizens provide, in any form, in any place, will be considered and evaluated based on the expertise of said citizen and evidence they provide and will never be dismissed or classified as disinformation out of hand. Our desire is that no penalties of any sort be applied to any person for submitting information in good faith."tuttle wrote: 17 May 2022, 07:16 . . .The congressman keeps asking what legal ramifications should be placed on citizens for UFO disinformation (the rep is LaHood).
You know something like that rather than labeling folks as crackpot conspiracy theorists spreading misinformation.
But I wondered too if his question was more fishing to see how they'd answer.
First read of the thread right now.tuttle wrote: 17 May 2022, 06:07 Today a House sub committee is holding the first hearing about UFOs in congress in over 50 years. It started a few moments ago. I'll live post if anything crazy happens (You'll hear it here first!)
Think it'll be any more than fluff and bluster?
joegoat wrote: 17 May 2022, 06:20 Wait until Ukraine, the formula shortage, and Roe v Wade are over. Aliens will be the next big thing. hush, you. yer ruining it..
sweetandsour wrote: 17 May 2022, 06:38What they need to do first thing is find the alien(s) responsible for mashing down corn and wheat fields, creating those weird patterns.joegoat wrote: 17 May 2022, 06:20 Wait until Ukraine, the formula shortage, and Roe v Wade are over. Aliens will be the next big thing.
preach.
tuttle wrote: 17 May 2022, 06:43 The reporting protocol for personnel:
the tuttle opine:
1) contact intel officer who would ensure data preservation
No. Contact your best bud on duty at the time and figure out if yer not a nut-case...
the tuttle opine:
2) fill out form including tons of details, it goes through operation chain of command and also the UAP taskforce to database it and follow up interviews
OK. Lemme man 'splain it to you ok, Lucy? We, the all encompassing we; from every Armed Service Jr NCO's would want to FRAG yer bum. :
the tuttle opine:
3) Data is researched in database
Wrong City, duder. We, the formally referenced Junior non-coms, scream in your face:
NO! Nothing I do is searchable by ANYONE! That's why we have NCO's. Plausible deniability was invented by the DoD.